US stocks & ETFs strategy backtests, lowest drawdown first

These strategies trade US-listed stocks and ETFs, including 3x leveraged index ETFs such as TQQQ and UPRO with Treasury, gold or cash ETFs as the defensive side. Most of them switch between a growth sleeve and a defensive sleeve on a trend or momentum signal, so the drawdown they report is mostly the cost of the signal being late, not the full fall of the leveraged fund itself.

23 strategies. Median max drawdown 27.0%, median CAGR 17.6%. Shallowest drawdown: Mega-Cap Price Acceleration and Quality Engine (-14.0%). Highest return per unit of drawdown: Tactical ETF Regime Switcher (2.46).

By strategy type: Momentum rotation 11, Factor 4, Trend following 4, Volatility targeting & hedging 3, Intraday & microstructure 1.

Max drawdown →CAGR ↑0%57%52%

Each dot is one strategy: further left is a shallower worst fall, higher up is a higher annual rate. The upper-left corner is where return came with the least drawdown.

Backtests, lowest drawdown first

#StrategyMax drawdownRisk tierCAGRSharpeReturn ÷ drawdownPeriod
1Mega-Cap Price Acceleration and Quality Engine-14.0%Lower drawdown+15.6%1.331.112016–2026
2Tactical ETF Regime Switcher-14.6%Lower drawdown+35.9%1.562.462020–2026
3Tactical Index Acceleration-14.7%Lower drawdown+17.2%1.111.172016–2026
4Canary-Signaled Tactical ETF Strategy-16.9%Moderate drawdown+4.5%0.460.272016–2026
5Vigilant Leveraged Trend Rotation-18.6%Moderate drawdown+10.7%0.820.572016–2026
6Tsallis Entropy Weight Optimization-19.0%Moderate drawdown+17.8%1.020.942016–2026
7Volatility Managed Index Portfolio-19.6%Moderate drawdown+11.9%0.820.612016–2026
8Systematic Option Collar-21.5%Moderate drawdown+18.3%1.060.852016–2026
9Dynamic Factor Strength Strategy-24.1%Moderate drawdown+17.9%0.970.742016–2026
10Tactical Leveraged Trend Rotation-25.4%High drawdown+17.8%0.810.72016–2026
11The Turtle Tactical Trend System-25.5%High drawdown+15.8%0.770.622016–2026
12Same-Weekday Return Continuation-27.0%High drawdown+12.9%0.660.482016–2026
13Velocity Strength Filter-27.4%High drawdown+17.6%0.840.642016–2026
14Intraday Opening Range Breakout-30.9%High drawdown+35.3%1.061.142016–2026
15Tactical Gearing System-31.0%High drawdown+17.0%0.90.552016–2026
16Asymmetric Trend-Following System-33.4%High drawdown+12.1%0.630.362016–2026
17Return Stacking with Capital-Efficient Overlays-33.5%High drawdown+43.7%1.171.32016–2026
18Fifty-Two Week High Leaderboard-34.5%High drawdown+15.8%0.720.462016–2026
19Growth-Value Style Selection-35.0%High drawdown+29.6%0.970.852016–2026
20Gross Profitability and Price Acceleration-36.6%Very high drawdown+17.4%0.780.482016–2026
21Kaufman Efficiency Index Strategy-48.6%Very high drawdown+23.5%0.820.482016–2026
22Faber Ivy Amplified Leaderboard-49.6%Very high drawdown+51.7%1.011.042016–2026
23Leveraged Dual Momentum ETF-57.2%Very high drawdown+38.5%0.890.672018–2026

Re-run 2026-10-04.

Head-to-head comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which US stocks & ETFs strategy had the lowest drawdown?

Mega-Cap Price Acceleration and Quality Engine, with a worst fall of -14.0% and a CAGR of +15.6% from 2016-10-21 to 2026-10-02.

Which US stocks & ETFs strategy earned the most per unit of drawdown?

Tactical ETF Regime Switcher: +35.9% CAGR against a -14.6% max drawdown, a return-to-drawdown (Calmar) ratio of 2.46.

Are these live trading results?

No. Each number comes from re-running the strategy's current code on historical prices. Backtests leave out some real costs and do not predict future returns.

Browse the backtests another way

By asset class

By strategy type

Risk-based rankings

Metric guides

All strategy backtests, lowest drawdown first

Go further

Disclosure. Backtests are hypothetical simulations on historical data. They do not include every real-world cost, are not live results, and do not guarantee future returns. Educational research only, not investment advice.